Breaking news. Trump says agreement to end Iran war ‘largely negotiated’

Breaking News: Trump Announces Agreement to End Iran War ‘Largely Negotiated’

news Trump says agreement to end Iran – On Saturday, U.S. President Donald Trump revealed that a draft agreement with Iran—aimed at concluding the ongoing conflict—has reached a stage of substantial completion. According to his post on Truth Social, the deal is “subject to finalisation” and includes critical provisions such as the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Trump indicated that the remaining details are being ironed out and will be unveiled “shortly,” signaling progress in the diplomatic process.

Strait of Hormuz and Regional Influence

The agreement, as outlined by Trump, would see the Strait of Hormuz reopened, a vital corridor for global oil and gas trade. This move is expected to alleviate economic pressures caused by Iran’s recent closure of the waterway. The U.S. leader also highlighted his recent discussions with key regional allies, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, and Bahrain. These interactions underscore the growing sway of Gulf states in shaping the terms of the deal, which Trump claims has led to a consensus on ending the war.

Separately, Trump praised a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, stating it “went very well.” This exchange, along with the collaboration with Gulf nations, reflects a broader strategy to align regional interests with U.S. objectives. The president emphasized that the agreement’s framework was “largely negotiated,” leaving only minor adjustments for final approval.

Context of the Conflict

The war between the U.S. and Iran began on 28 February with coordinated strikes targeting Iranian military infrastructure. These attacks disrupted ongoing nuclear talks and prompted Iran to retaliate by effectively sealing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for the region’s energy exports. The closure of the strait, coupled with the U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, has caused significant economic strain worldwide.

According to the Associated Press, a regional official with direct knowledge of the negotiations revealed that the U.S. and Iran were nearing a deal. This agreement would include an official declaration of the war’s end and the lifting of sanctions on Tehran. The official noted that the two-month-long discussions, led by Pakistan, had narrowed key differences, particularly around the strategic reopening of the strait and the US ending its naval restrictions on Iranian ports.

Iran’s Position and Nuclear Talks

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, described the draft agreement as a “framework agreement” during a statement quoted by the IRNA news agency. Baghaei stated, “We want this to include the main issues required for ending the imposed war and other issues of essential importance to us.” He added that the final stages of the deal would be resolved within 30 to 60 days, after which a formal agreement would be reached.

“Our focus at this stage is on ending the war on all fronts, including Lebanon,” Baghaei said, emphasizing that lifting sanctions has been a central demand. He also clarified that nuclear program negotiations are not part of the current discussions, as Iran prioritizes concluding the conflict before addressing its nuclear ambitions.

Baghaei further noted that recent talks had shown a “trend toward narrowing differences,” highlighting the momentum behind the agreement. The official described the deal as a foundation for broader diplomatic efforts, with the next phase focusing on refining details and securing mutual commitments.

Trump’s Strategy and Military Holdup

Trump had previously delayed a potential military strike against Iran, citing “serious negotiations” as the reason. The president claimed the conflict was being managed through dialogue rather than force, a shift that aligns with the influence of Middle Eastern allies. However, his approach has been marked by inconsistency, with multiple deadlines set for Iran and then later abandoned.

The conflict, which started on 28 February, saw the U.S. and Israel launch strikes that targeted Iranian military assets. This action forced Iran to respond by closing the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting global energy markets and causing supply chain challenges. In retaliation, the U.S. imposed a blockade on Iranian ports, a move that has drawn criticism from various international stakeholders.

According to the U.S. Central Command, over 100 commercial vessels have been turned away since the blockade began on 13 April. Additionally, four ships have been disabled during this period, further illustrating the economic toll of the dispute. The agency’s statement underscores the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz and the impact of the U.S. actions on regional and global trade.

Broader Implications and Regional Dynamics

Trump’s announcement highlights a potential pivot in U.S. policy toward Iran, moving from confrontation to negotiation. The involvement of Gulf states in the process has been pivotal, as they have played a key role in mediating between the U.S. and Iran. Pakistan, in particular, has been a central figure in these talks, facilitating the two-month-long dialogue that brought the parties closer to an agreement.

The agreement’s success hinges on mutual concessions, with both sides acknowledging the need to resolve the conflict. Iran’s focus on ending the war first, before addressing nuclear issues, suggests a strategic priority. Meanwhile, the U.S. aims to secure Iran’s compliance with its demands, including the reopening of the strait and the lifting of sanctions.

As the negotiations progress, the international community will be watching closely. The deal could serve as a template for future agreements, potentially easing tensions in the region. However, the political dynamics within the U.S. and Iran remain complex, and the finalization of the agreement may depend on domestic pressures and international support.

Susan Miller

Susan Miller specializes in helping small and medium-sized businesses strengthen their cybersecurity foundations. She has developed training programs focused on practical, cost-effective protection strategies. Her articles highlight cybersecurity for small businesses, affordable security tools, remote workforce protection, and security awareness training.

100 article(s) published